An Investigation of Modern Physics by Brian Williams
RSS icon Home icon
  • Physics in the News – Higgs Boson

    Posted on December 13th, 2011 Brian 10 comments

    Note;  A Hypothesis can be any idea that someone dreams up. It does not require any proof or logical basis.

    ——————————————————

    See also “How Physicists “find” their Particles”, which gives my prediction on 25th June 2011 and why. If you really want to understand about the problem with the Higgs Boson you need to understand how physicists ‘find’ them and all their other ‘particles’.

    ———–———————————————

    Extract from above post. Posted on 25th June 2011

    “Tevatron teams clash over new physics.”

    All the above comments also apply to the Tevatron accelerator in the USA, currently in the news. I suspect that they are struggling to find a magic particle to enable them to keep the unit open. (It is due to close shortly.)

    —————————————————–

    “The rare beauty of modern physics is that it is completely untainted by reality.” Brian Williams

    From http://ww.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16116236

    Q&A: The Higgs boson

    Changes in Red are by Brian

    The Higgs is a theorised [Hypothesized] sub-atomic particle – one of the “fundamental” ones that are the most basic building blocks of the Universe. Unlike atoms, these fundamental particles are not thought to be made up of anything else. The Higgs is so important because it helps the current best-guess theory [Hypothesis]of the Universe – the Standard Model – explain how other particles obtain mass. The theory[Hypothesis] has it that as the Universe cooled after the Big Bang, [another hypothesis]an invisible force known as the Higgs field formed together with its associated boson particle. This field imparts mass to the other fundamental particles.

    What’s so important about mass?

    Mass [Inertia] is the resistance of an object to changes in its velocity. Without this Higgs field, the Universe would be a very different place – particles would zip through the cosmos at the speed of light. The way this field confers mass on other particles has previously been likened to the way water in a swimming pool makes it harder for you to move when you try to wade through it. The Higgs field permeates the Universe the way water fills a pool. [Mass has nothing to do with ‘fields’, ‘charges’ or swimming pools.] This paragraph is complete waffle. A magnetic field could reduce the speed of an object, but it would not affect its inertia or its mass.

    How do we know the Higgs exists?

    Strictly speaking, we do not, and that is what is so exciting about the announcements to be made at the Large Hadron Collider – the giant experiment that was built in part to hunt for the Higgs. The particle was first proposed in 1964 by six physicists, including the Edinburgh-based theoretician Peter Higgs, as an explanation for the property of mass.

    The Standard Model is an instruction booklet for how the cosmos works – a framework that explains how the different particles and forces interact. But one chapter of the booklet remains unfinished – unlike the other fundamental particles, the Higgs has never been observed by experiments. [ What they are saying is that if they cannot find the mythical Higgs Boson, they can spend billions of £s attempting to find some other mythical particle.]

    How do scientists search for the Higgs boson?

    Ironically, the Standard Model does not predict an exact mass for the Higgs itself. Particle accelerators like the LHC are used to systematically search for the particle over a range of masses where it could plausibly be. The LHC works by smashing two beams of protons [Protons are another type of mythical particle.]together at close to light speed, generating other particles. It is not the first machine to hunt for the boson. The LEP machine, which ran at Cern from 1989-2000, ruled out the Higgs up to a mass of 114 gigaelectronvolts (GeV; thanks to the equivalence of mass and energy laid out in the equation E=mc2, [The seriously incompetent formulae from Einstein.] particle physicists talk about the energy in accelerators’ beams and the masses of the particles they look for in the same terms). The US Tevatron accelerator searched for the particle above this mass range before it was switched off this year. These data are still being analysed, and could yet be important in helping confirm or rule out the boson, say physicists. The LHC, as the most powerful particle accelerator ever built, is just the most high-profile of the experiments that could shed light on the Higgs hunt. [Note: The constant search for mythical particles is mainly due to Einstein’s faulty mathematics]

    When will we know if we have found it?

    The Higgs boson is unstable; if produced among the billions of collisions at the LHC, it will quickly decay into more stable, lower-mass particles. Physicists have to infer the production of a Higgs using these decay products. Hints of the Higgs would look like a little spike or “bump” in physicists’ graphs. Results at the LHC and elsewhere carry a mark of approval in the form of statistical certainty – the degree to which observations are likely to be due to real effects, rather than statistical flukes that crop up in billions of collisions. A standard of “five sigma” is required to turn such hints into a discovery. This means there is less than a one in a million chance that the bump is a statistical fluke. It is almost certain that scientists at the LHC will be able to announce results at this level.

    What if we don’t find it?

    Most professional physicists would say that finding the Higgs in precisely the form that [the] theory [Hypothesis] predicts would actually be a disappointment. Large-scale projects such as the LHC are built with the aim of expanding knowledge, and confirming the existence of the Higgs right where we expect it – while it would be a triumph for our understanding of physics – would be far less exciting than not finding it. If future studies definitively confirm that the Higgs does not exist, much if not all of the Standard Model would have to be rewritten. That in turn would launch new lines of enquiry that would almost certainly revolutionise our understanding of the Universe, in much the same way as something missing in physics a century ago led to the development of the revolutionary ideas of quantum mechanics.

     

    Brian

     

    10 responses to “Physics in the News – Higgs Boson”

    1. carolinehale

      Right, I’m off to lunch. By the time I get back, I want the origins of the universe to have been explained CERN HiggsBoson.
      —————
      THE universe was, is and always will be. Our ‘known’ universe is only a faint accidental glimmer, hardly discernable in THE universe.
      Brian

    2. Barias

      Interesting post and 1 which needs to be more extensively known about in my view. Your level of detail is beneficial and also the clarity of writing is excellent. I have bookmarked it for you so that others are going to be able to see what you’ll want to say.

    3. Geney

      Good idea, Can be considered a learned thing, ok.

    4. Jacquiline

      Good blog post, I am viewing back regularly to hunt for posts.

    5. Glenna Thomes

      Some times its a pain in the ass to read what people wrote but this internet site is rattling user pleasant! .

    6. Just desire to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity in your put up is simply spectacular and i could think you’re knowledgeable in this subject. Fine with your permission let me to take hold of your RSS feed to keep up to date with imminent post. Thanks one million and please keep up the gratifying work.

    7. Dave Wirth

      I simply couldn’t go away your website prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard information a person supply for your guests? Is going to be again ceaselessly in order to investigate cross-check new posts

    8. Onesie

      Hey There. I found your blog using msn. That is a really well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and return to learn more of your useful information. Thanks for the post. I will definitely return.

    9. Sharyn Haislip

      Really good visual appeal on this website , I’d rate it 10 10.

    10. Awesome website you have here but I was curious if you knew of any user discussion forums that cover the same topics talked about here? I’d really like to be a part of online community where I can get comments from other experienced people that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Cheers!
      ———————————-
      As the technical/physics content of this website is unique, i would certainly enjoy some on-line discussions.
      The problem is that physicists do not want to discuss this.

      Brian

    Leave a reply