An Investigation of Modern Physics by Brian Williams
• ## Einstein’s Wrong Formulae

Posted on June 26th, 2009

Do you know the important differences between these formulae?

 t1 = [d/(c + v)] + [d/(c – v) ] A1 t1 = [d1/(c + v )] + [d2/(c – v)] A2 t2 = 2d/(c2 – v2)0.5 B1 t2 = (d1 + d2)/(c2 + v2)0.5 B2

Formulae A1 and B1 are the ones used by physicists to ‘prove’ the constant speed of light on the assumption that they are in accordance with classical mechanics. These are the formulae given in physics books. Unfortunately, they are both “special case” formulae which are quite specifically not applicable to the Michelson – Morley experiment on which Einstein’s Relativity is based.

Formulae A2 and B2 are the ones that are correct in accordance with classical mechanics. Although the differences appear minor, Einstein’s Relativity, The Constant Speed of Light, Time Dilation, E = mc2 etc. are all based on the formulae A1 and B1.

More importantly, the above formulae are only 25% of the mathematics needed to solve the problem of the Michelson-Morley experiment. The other 75% is not even considered by Einstein and the rest of the physics establishment

Einstein, not understanding mechanics, did not realise the implications of this error of Michelson and Morley and carried the same error into his own calculations.

If the correct formulae are used i.e. A2 and B2, plus the omitted 75% , all the above hypotheses become extinct, and light is proved to strictly follow the principles of classical mechanics.

Does it matter? Yes, the use of the wrong formulae has cost the people of the UK billions of pounds, and is still costing many millions of pounds every year.

Physics or Fantasy – Section 1 details the errors in full and shows that the mathematics relating to the time of transit for the beams of light in the Michelson – Morley experiment are more complex than realised by the physicists.

### 7 responses to “Einstein’s Wrong Formulae”

1. Tonita Marbut

____________________
Buy my book. This is the only way
Brian

2. Jimmie Michael

——————–
The physics establishment have never got around to making a full investigation into the mathematics. As far as I can determine Physics or Fantasy – Section 1 is the only source for the complete mathematical investigation.
Brian

3. Guiri

I can see that A1 is wrong. What most people miss is that “d” is not distance according to Einstein it’s “length”.
If you check out the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies 1905 section 2 you will see the error.
Although it is without doubt a fact that the speed of light is a constant, because of this mistake Einstein’s proof fails and proves nothing.
———————-
The main problem is that the mathematics that Einstein and the rest of the physics establishment insist on quoting, is only a quarter of formula required to work out the time taken for the light beams to travel the paths in the Michelson-Morley experiment. My book explains the full mechanics and mathematics. If the speed of light was a constant then the experiment would not have given any result whatever.
Brian

4. Wilbur

Hi there,
Thank you! I would now go on this blog every day!

5. Kelley Herring

Spot on with this write-up, I really think this topic: Einstein& wants rather more consideration. I’ll probably be once more to learn far more, thanks for that info.

6. Having fun your new write-up. Thanks a lot for presenting this important info, Now i’m likely to book mark this content. Thank you for a second time!

7. I and my pals appeared to be checking the nice points from your web blog and then all of a sudden developed an awful feeling I had not thanked the web blog owner for those tips. The young boys were definitely as a result warmed to study all of them and already have clearly been taking pleasure in these things. Appreciation for genuinely considerably accommodating and for settling on this kind of quality resources most people are really wanting to be aware of. My personal honest regret for not saying thanks to sooner.